Thank you for your response.  There is not currently any sort of space
issue so your suggestion of including the source is probably a good idea.  
I appreciate the feedback as I wish to make sure that if I distribute anything 
that it is done correctly.
 
> Subject: Re: standalone application distribution
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 08:17:56 +0000
> CC: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> On 4 Jan 2014, at 05:39, a b <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > After having successfully gotten a GNUstep application to run on Win7 where 
> > no GNUstep is installed (reference #1), I am now attempting to perform a 
> > cleanup 
> > which will result in something which could be distributed to a Windows user 
> > who 
> > has not installed GNUstep. 
> >  
> > According to the "Introduction to GNUstep"   (reference #2)  at 
> > www.gnustep.org,
> > the GNUstep libraries are covered under the GNU Lesser (Library) Public 
> > License 
> > while the stand-alone tools in GNUstep are under the standard GPL.  
> > SystemPreferences confirms this in the info panel as follows:
> >                    SystemPreferences
> >                    GNUstep System Preferences
> >                    Release: 1.2.0
> >                    Authors: Riccardo Mottola
> >                                 Enrico Sersale <[email protected]>
> >                    http://www.gnustep.org/experience/systempreferences.htm
> >                    Copyright (C) 2005-2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >                    Released under the GNU General Public License 2.0 or 
> > later
> >                    Current theme: WinUXTheme
> >  
> > SystemPreferences appears to be composed of the following executable
> > and associated files:
> >                     Directory    SystemPreferences
> >                                     Size   Name
> >                                     6,613 GNUstep.conf       (*** added 
> > since GNUstep is not installed ***)
> >                         <DIR>          Resources
> >                                   247,017 SystemPreferences.exe
> >                      Directory    SystemPreferences\Resources
> >                                      Size   Name
> >                         <DIR>          English.lproj
> >                                      723 Info-gnustep.plist
> >                                      306 SystemPreferences.desktop
> >                                   9,662 SystemPreferences.ico
> >                                   9,530 SystemPreferences.tiff
> >  
> >                      Directory    SystemPreferences\Resources\English.lproj
> >                         <DIR>          SystemPreferences.gorm
> >                      Directory    
> > SystemPreferences\Resources\English.lproj\SystemPreferences.gorm
> >                                    Size   Name
> >                                    426 data.classes
> >                                    184 data.info
> >                                 2,511 objects.gorm
> >  
> > Based upon the answers I received to my earlier questions
> > I believe that it is permitted to distribute just these files in a 
> > standalone package with the necessary GNUstep .dlls and configuration
> > files.  Based upon previous discussion, I believe that this would fall under
> > binary distribution so no distribution of the source code would be 
> > necessary.
> > Also no modification was made to any of the GNUstep or SystemPreferences
> > files which I feel would also negate the need for distribution of the 
> > source.
> >  
> > Would anyone care to comment on this, and if any of this would require 
> > source code 
> > distribution please point out the relevant parts?
> >  
> > Thanks
> 
> Obviously if you haven't modified the source, there's no modified source for 
> you to supply.
> When you are supplying some binary built from unmodified source within your 
> package, you need to make the source available ... but that could just mean 
> you tell people to look at the GNUstep website, so I think you are right to 
> say you don't need to provide the source.
> 
> However, the source code doesn't take a huge amount of space ... so unless 
> there's a particular space issue that makes it impractical,  I would consider 
> it a courtesy to the end user to supply the source code as part of the 
> package, even though you aren't obliged to do so.
> 
                                          
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to