When we discussed the prospect of moving to GitHub someone suggested that it "would invite contributions from nonassigned members of the community." I'm wondering if this is a bad thing.
I have long had a problem with the assignment requirement as it limits participation in a project which already has limited participation due to it's focused nature. Would it not be a good idea to open up contributions to the world at large and allow unassigned contributions into the project? What problems would this solve? I believe we would have a larger variety of people contributing to gnustep and it would ultimately remove what some see as a barrier to entry since some people don't want to disclaim or assign their copyrights. This is especially pertinent to the move to GitHub since I have noticed that when the mirror was running there were a number of forks of the repos and a number of pull requests after it was up for a while. Btw, I was not confusing git with GitHub. GitHub is a social platform for allowing coders to collaborate. This is why I think they move would be a good idea. Let me know if you guys have any thoughts. GC -- Gregory Casamento Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) http://www.gnustep.org http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
