It is developed, just not very actively, as of late.  If you need any of
the following following types, you will need a work around because they
aren't implemented:
* CFBundle
* CFMachPort
* CFMessagePort
* CFPlugIn
* CFPreference
* CFPropertyList (I'm slowly working my way through this one, at the moment)
* CFNotificationCenter
* CFUserNotification
* CFSocket (I'm not actually sure about this one, I think Lubos might've
done some work on it a while back)
* CFXML* (these are now deprecated, and I do not plan on implementing them
at all)

I would appreciate any bug reports you might throw my way and do my best to
fix them but, to be perfectly honest, time is an issue.  I encourage
contributions to CoreBase as it is in dire need of some TLC.

If you're willing to put some time into it, I would appreciate if you could
see how far you can get with the current code before discarding it
altogether.  The SVN version of the code is fairly useful, despite not yet
stable.

Stef

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jens Alfke <[email protected]> wrote:

> Looks like the issue is with the declaration of CFString — here's the
> snippet from CFBase.h:
>
> > #if __OBJC__
> > @class NSString;
> > @class NSMutableString;
> > typedef NSString * CFStringRef;
> > typedef NSMutableString * CFMutableStringRef;
> > #else
> > typedef const struct __CFString * CFStringRef;
> > typedef struct __CFString * CFMutableStringRef;
> > #endif
>
> This definitely isn't going to work with ARC, since it declares
> CFStringRef as an Objective-C object and gets the compiler involved in the
> refcounting of them. That causes trouble with the inline code in
> CFString.h, as I already found, and of course it'll be incompatible with
> any CFString-using code being ported from Apple platforms, which will be
> using manual CFRetain/CFRelease.
>
> I can start messing with CFBase.h to remedy this, but I'm wondering if
> this is just the tip of the iceberg. I was already worried about CoreBase
> being numbered "0.1" and not being included in GNUstep … is it at all
> supported? Or would I be taking on a big development task to get it to work
> with my code?
>
> —Jens
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to