On Thursday, March 26, 2015, Gregory Casamento <[email protected]>
wrote:

> German
>
> On Thursday, March 26, 2015, Germán Arias <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> El jue, 26-03-2015 a las 01:47 -0400, Gregory Casamento escribió:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thursday, March 26, 2015, Germán Arias <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >         El jue, 26-03-2015 a las 00:15 -0400, Gregory Casamento
>> >         escribió:
>> >         > German
>> >         >
>> >         > On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Germán Arias
>> >         <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >         >         Some weeks ago I tried to install gnustep-base on
>> >         CrystaX [1]
>> >         >         However
>> >         >         the support for Objective-C is not complete. But
>> >         CrystaX has
>> >         >         been
>> >         >         started a fundraising campaign [2] and one of its
>> >         goal is
>> >         >         provide a
>> >         >         complete support for Objective-C and (depending of
>> >         the
>> >         >         collected money)
>> >         >         frameworks like CoreData and CoreGraphics. If that
>> >         campaign is
>> >         >         successful, it can also be great for GNUstep.
>> >         >
>> >         >         Germán
>> >         >
>> >         >         [1] https://www.crystax.net/en
>> >         >         [2]
>> >         https://www.bountysource.com/teams/crystaxndk/fundraiser
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         > I'm not a naysayer and what he's planning sounds beneficial.
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         > His fundraiser doesn't seem to mention GNUstep.  Is he
>> >         thinking about
>> >         > implementing these Cocoa compatible frameworks without
>> >         leveraging
>> >         > GNUstep?
>> >
>> >         I think yes, but if they offers full support for Objective-C
>> >         we will be
>> >         able to install GNUstep (at least gnustep-base) on CrystaX
>> >         with the
>> >         advantage that libcrystax offers all functionalities missed on
>> >         libc of
>> >         android (Bionic).
>> >
>> >         Germán.
>> >
>> >         >
>> >         > GC
>> >         >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I guess I'm confused.  Why do people think implementing it themselves
>> > is the shorter path to success?  Does he not know about GNUstep?  I
>> > admit I was amused at the one month estimate for implementing a Cocoa
>> > compatible Foundation.
>> >
>> >
>> > GC
>> >
>>
>> He know GNUstep. See (section 4 "Objective-C support"):
>>
>> https://www.crystax.net/en/android/ndk/7
>>
>> Germán
>>
>>
>>
> I see.  I do question his reasoning though.  Porting GNUstep to android
> has happened twice.  Once with Apportable and again by Ivan Vucica (who got
> foundation compiling).  Porting GNUstep omis by far easier than rewriting
> it.  So, while its an admirable project, it will take a lot longer than he
> thinks to get everything done.
>
> GC
>
>
> --
> Gregory Casamento
> GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
> http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
> http://ind.ie/phoenix/
>

I need to emphasize. I'm not feeling criticizing to be an ass.  I want his
project to succeed.


-- 
Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
http://ind.ie/phoenix/
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to