...and I completely missed the part where you said libero.it is your ISP. I would guess that, given they ship a DMARC policy that (in combination with their SPF policy) breaks mailing lists, and that there's very little chance that they will let you update their DNS records :-) it may be time to obtain your own domain.
Or (possibly just for mailing lists) start using only an address that has non-broken policy records... 2015-04-12 21:48 GMT+01:00 Ivan Vučica <[email protected]>: > I'd be more worried about DMARC failure that's visible by Gmail users in > headers: > > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > spf=pass (google.com: domain of discuss-gnustep-bounces+ivan= > [email protected] designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) > [email protected]; > dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@; > dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=libero.it > > Inspect libero.it's SPF and DMARC records and adjust them accordingly, so > that gnu.org servers are allowed to send mails on behalf of users @ > libero.it: > https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-inspector/libero.it > > DMARC records currently order Gmail (and others) to quarantine emails > unless they were sent by servers in SPF records: > https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/libero.it > which seem to be some BlackBerry servers, plus those in 212.48.25.128/25 > IP range. > > It's possible that just adding "include:gnu.org" to libero.it's SPF > record would be enough. > > 2015-04-12 20:51 GMT+01:00 Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> >> not nice if I find myself as spam, even if the message is relayed from >> the list. Perhaps some of my emails did not get a reply for this reason... >> >> Luboš Doležel wrote: >> >>> * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail >>> provider >>> * (riccardo.mottola[at]libero.it) >>> >> >> But it is not freemail, even if libero means free. It is the provider I >> pay for my internet connection! >> >>> * 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and >>> * EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different >>> * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid >>> >> What is this error? I don't think it is something I can do something >> about, or? >> >> Riccardo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnustep mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >> > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
