Hi,
I want to use a different compiler than "default system cc", thus I
configured make this way:
$ ./configure --with-layout=gnustep --prefix=/ CC=egcc CXX=eg++
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-R/usr/local/li
I install gnustep-make, source my GNUstep.sh script and the configure
base simply by issuing "./configure".
I get this output:
checking for gcc... egcc
<...>
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether egcc accepts -g... yes
checking for egcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... egcc -E
this proofs that the setting is carried on as expected. Fine.
Then I go to gui and issue "./configure", I see:
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers /usr/X11R6/include
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
I think this is a bug, since gnustep-make settins should be inherited.
Why is it done for base and not gui? gnustep-back also doesn't use the
set compiler, only base.
Sure, I can pass every time a command line to configure, but this is
suboptimal. Mixing compilers is not good and if configure is smart for
-base, it should be in -gui and -back too!
Riccardo
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
