Le Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:40:57 +0100, Alessandro Sangiuliano <[email protected]> a écrit :
> I think we should see what is the best choice for GNUstep making it > to be accessible to users and developers as easy as we can, so: > > - Github: fork code with a button; start a new repo with a button; > easy management of merge request, not so bad in showing diffs; > interesting plugins; maybe not so nice in bug tracking; it uses git > that is OPEN SOURCE, you are not forced to use its proprietary > front-end; it is probably the most used platform to host code; it is > full of people; what we need absolutely… people! > - I never heard about Gitlab before, so I can’t talk about it. > - Savannah: Seems a place where requests take weeks before to be > completed; it doesn’t have the Github features in managing repos and > projects; it looks a bit abandoned; to contribute to a project a > person has to ask for an account and then for permissions. On github > a person can fork the code, contribute to it, then does a merge > request and project managers can accept it or just discard it in an > easy way. > What about Fossil ? http://fossil-scm.org/ - totally free - doesn't need a server - can be easily setup on any hosting service - everybody can host everything because all parts are embedded in Fossil (code + website, wiki, tickets, docs, etc.) See this comparison with git http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki While first steps in Git may be easier (I personally use Git), Fossil is a very good and fast dvcs. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_(software) Xavier Brochard _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
