On Mar 4, 2016 11:03 AM, "Richard Frith-Macdonald" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > On 4 Mar 2016, at 15:57, Richard Frith-Macdonald <
[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 3 Mar 2016, at 15:00, Tristan Bellogi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> # The 2 failed tests
> >> base/NSNumberFormatter/basic10_4.m:
> >> Failed test:         basic10_4.m:145 ... negativeFormat used for -ve
number
> >
> > This one I can't reproduce, but it sounds like a very minor bug,
unlikely to be a problem in most software.  It might help to know what the
actual format produced was (should be in tests.log), what version of icu is
on your system, and what your locale is set to, since the icu library and
the locale are the things likely to influence number formatting.  It's
possible that the testcase is wrong.
>
> What I mean is, while we want to get any bug fixed (and if you can
provide more info, it might help with that; if it means someone can
reproduce it), I don't think this is one you need to actually worry about.

I've ran into these sort of issues a bunch of times with the formatting
code. The problem is that ICU keeps changing/refining the output of its
formatters, so it is very hard to run unit tests on them.

It's strange that it's happening with a number formatter, though.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to