> On 10 May 2016, at 16:17, Eric Heintzmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > Le 10/05/2016 11:41, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit : >> >> On the one hand, the particular number format stuff is rarely used, so a bug >> there may not be important (and may depend on the particular ICU library >> shipped on the system). > I've tried to use Tests/base/NSNumberFormatter/basic.m and > Tests/base/NSNumberFormatter/basic10.4.m from svn trunk without success. > I latest ICU from debian unstable ie package: libicu55 (55.1-7) and > libicu-dev (55.1-7) > > (It seems the is currently an ICU transition in debian unstable/testing. I > will investigate) > > Should I disable the test at build time ?
You can do testHopeful = YES; before the testcase, and testHopeful = NO; after the testcase, to turn it into a 'hope' (something which should ideally pass, but may not). >> On the other, we really want to fix *any* failure of the regression tests. >> Does the same problem occur with gnustep-base from svn trunk? >> Can you get a stack trace of the crash? >> > I have these lines on screen when building: > > *** stack smashing detected ***: ./obj/basic terminated > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x71fe5)[0x7ff6aeef6fe5] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7ff6aef7e357] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x0)[0x7ff6aef7e320] > ./obj/basic(main+0xa4d)[0x401abd] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf0)[0x7ff6aeea5610] > ./obj/basic(_start+0x29)[0x4021e9] Unfortunately I have little idea how to interpret that :-( _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
