The correct course of action is to keep the gorm file. It is what the majority of the apps written using GNUstep use. I would prefer that another template be created which uses the gsmarkup. In retrospect I'm. It certain why this was done.
Sorry for the top post I am replying from my phone. GC On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 17:24 Graham Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > the Application project template in ProjectCenter contains both a .gorm > file and .gsmarkup files. The GNUmakefile includes all of these as > resources for the target. This is confusing, as I wasn't sure what I needed > to edit in order to design my application. After some testing (on Linux, I > haven't tested on Mac) I found that the .gorm file was being used by the > built app, but the .gsmarkup files do not seem to be. I tested this by > editing the title of a main menu item in each then building the app: only > when I edited the menu in the .gorm file did my changes appear. > > I will fix this template up so that it only contains one UI definition. My > preference would be to keep the .gorm file, but would the maintainers > prefer people use GORM or GSMarkup? Or is there a reason I've missed why > the project template would include both? > > Thanks, > Graham. > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
