@Daniel: I left a few comments on the proposal. It generally looks reasonable. I think we can work with the goal of 'get something up and running' and 'have a good idea of what needs to be done to get WebCore ported'.
@Fred: Can you send your details to Giuseppe Scrivano? I wouldn't mind help. On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Daniel Ferreira (theiostream) < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > In gui Daniel could work for example on the NSTextBlock or whatever bit > of layout mechanism is still needed to cover basic web layout. > > I'll have a look up there. Maybe I can do something over there prior > to the coding period to understand better where exactly GNUstep is > regarding AppKit and CoreGraphics/friends implementations. > > > I find the proposal very attractive and even if we won’t get a full > working WebKit at least we will have a better overview of which parts are > still missing in GNUstep to support it. As for the missing frameworks there > are different sources where part of these could be taken from. This is not > central to GNUstep so even non GPL frameworks could do here. > > Thanks for the view on the proposal, and for clearing up using foreign > frameworks in GNUstep. > > Also, I have submitted a proposal draft to the Google Summer of Code > website, and it's on this Google Doc: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ctVWarEbiIh4lNtcdp1tCT1iuxO__ > pldVDbvBIfTcc0/edit?usp=sharing. > I do not know if that will eventually land on you, but I'd appreciate > feedback, if possible, prior to sending the final version on Monday. > > If you prefer not to load that Google Doc, please let me know and I'll > paste a plaintext version here. > > Thanks, > -- Daniel. >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
