Stefan,

the result remains correct, but now I had 2 warnings when compiling. I
don't know if that has any meaning though.

[edwin@ottopedi ~/ICUTest]$ cc test_icu.c `icu-config --ldflags
--ldflags-icuio`-I/usr/local/include
test_icu.c:15:13:* warning:* implicit declaration of function
'u_strFromUTF8' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
pattern = u_strFromUTF8 (buffer, 128, NULL, "yyyyMMdd hh:mm", 14, status);
            ^
test_icu.c:15:11: *warning:* incompatible integer to pointer conversion
assigning to 'UChar *' (aka 'unsigned short *') from 'int'
      [-Wint-conversion]
  pattern = u_strFromUTF8 (buffer, 128, NULL, "yyyyMMdd hh:mm", 14, status);
          ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.
[edwin@ottopedi ~/ICUTest]$ ls -al
total 24
drwxr-xr-x   2 edwin  edwin   512 Sep 14 22:41 .
drwxr-xr-x  38 edwin  edwin  3072 Sep 14 22:41 ..
-rwxr-xr-x   1 edwin  edwin  7174 Sep 14 22:41 a.out
-rw-r--r--   1 edwin  edwin  1462 Sep 14 22:40 test_icu.c
-rw-r--r--   1 edwin  edwin  1334 Sep 14 22:39 test_icu1.c
[edwin@ottopedi ~/ICUTest]$
[edwin@ottopedi ~/ICUTest]$ ./a.out
Date Formatted with defaults: 20170914 10:41 p.m.
Date Formatted with defaults: 14 sep. 2017
Date Formatted with defaults: 14 september 2017 om 22:41:38 CEST

I you have any ideaes about things that I could try to shed some light on
this....

Kind regards,

Edwin


2017-09-14 22:23 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bidigaray <[email protected]>:

> Hmm... There definitely something wrong in GNUstep, then. The question is
> what!? Looking at the code, I'm not entirely sure what could be happening,
> and why your system is giving different results than mine. You are using
> ICU version 58.2, so I'm wondering if some behavior changed between what I
> have (version 55.1) and the later ICU releases.
>
> I modified the previous test to verify that your version of ICU does the
> same thing as previous releases. Can you please recheck? Maybe later
> versions are be choosing the pattern over the styles. This is the only
> thing I can think of, right now.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sep 14, 2017 15:47, "Edwin Ancaer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Stefan,
>>
>> the result is correct now
>>
>> [edwin@ottopedi ~/ICUTest]$ ./a.out
>>
>> Date Formatted with defaults: 20170914 09:40 p.m.
>> Date Formatted with defaults: 14 sep. 2017
>> Date Formatted with defaults: 14 september 2017 om 21:40:33 CEST
>>
>> Does this mean the problem is in my GNUstep installation?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>> 2017-09-14 18:28 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bidigaray <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Hi Edwin,
>>> The attached test does something very similar to GNUstep, and you should
>>> get the same answers. Can you check this out and report back?
>>>
>>> To build:
>>> cc test_icu.c `icu-config --ldflags --ldflags-icuio`
>>>
>>> My results:
>>> Date Formatted with defaults: 20170914 12:26 p.m.
>>> Date Formatted with defaults: 14 sep. 2017
>>> Date Formatted with defaults: 14 september 2017 12:26:33 GMT-4
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Stefan Bidigaray <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll come up with a test for ICU and post it here. I'll make sure to
>>>> use the same functions used by GNUstep to verify.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still betting the problem is in your ICU installation. The GNUstep
>>>> code is a thin layer on top of ICU, it's unlikely that the problem lies
>>>> there. I'm not saying impossible, just unlikely.
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 14, 2017 11:38, "Edwin Ancaer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stefan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I did, and the test returns the same wrong results:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:09.914 DateFormatter[80496:100318] the date as date
>>>>> object             2017-09-14 17:26:09 +0200
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:09.953 DateFormatter[80496:100318] Dateformatter
>>>>> defaults
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:09.970 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> timezone: Europe/Brussels
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:09.986 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> locale: nl_BE
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.003 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> datestyle: 0
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.020 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> timestyle: 0
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.023 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   Date formatted
>>>>> with defaults 20170914 05:26 p.m.
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.027 DateFormatter[80496:100318] DateFormatter:
>>>>> Date -> NoStyle, Time -> MediumStyle
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> timezone: Europe/Brussels
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> locale: nl_BE
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> datestyle: 0
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> timestyle: 2
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   Date formatted
>>>>> with style 20170914 05:26 p.m.
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318] DateFormatter:
>>>>> Date -> LongStyle, Time -> LongStyle
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> timezone: Europe/Brussels
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> locale: nl_BE
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> datestyle: 3
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   DateFormatter
>>>>> timestyle: 3
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:26:10.028 DateFormatter[80496:100318]   Date formatted
>>>>> with style 20170914 05:26 p.m.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could i run a C-program that formatted the date with locale nl and
>>>>> conclude
>>>>>   - the problem is in my ICU installation if the result of the program
>>>>> is wrong?
>>>>>  -  the problem is in my GNUstep installation if the result of the
>>>>> program is OK?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-09-14 17:05 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bidigaray <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Edwin,
>>>>>> From everything you've said so far, the problem doesn't seem to be in
>>>>>> GNUstep. The method you are using would return nil if ICU wasn't 
>>>>>> installed.
>>>>>> Additionally, the return value is what you'd expect from the en_US_POSIX
>>>>>> locale, the default in FreeBSD.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With that in mind, have you tried explicitly setting the formatter's
>>>>>> locale using the -setLocale: method? It's possible your setup is falling
>>>>>> back to the systemLocale, which would be a separate problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you tried running the test I attached in my previous email?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 14, 2017 10:38, "Edwin Ancaer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I return from holidays that have been haunted by this problem :-).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I asked about libicudata.so on the freebsd list. The answer was "
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *devel/icu is built --with-data-packaging=archive which means the
>>>>>>> data ends up in icudt* file e.g., $ pkg info -l icu | fgrep icudt | 
>>>>>>> xargs
>>>>>>> du -Ah  25M    /usr/local/share/icu/58.2/**icudt58l.dat*"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We compared the necessary ICU libraries and they all are present at
>>>>>>> my side, with more or less equal sizes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the config.log file for gnustep base, I found:
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> HAVE_GNUTLS='1'
>>>>>>> *HAVE_ICU='1'*
>>>>>>> HAVE_INET_NTOP='yes'
>>>>>>> HAVE_INET_PTON='yes'
>>>>>>> HAVE_LIBDISPATCH='1'
>>>>>>> HAVE_LIBXML='1'
>>>>>>> HAVE_LIBXSLT='1'
>>>>>>> HAVE_MDNS='0'
>>>>>>> HAVE_OBJC_SYNC_ENTER='yes'
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This seems to indicate ICU is used. Just to be sure, I added
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #if GS_USE_ICU == 1
>>>>>>>       NSLog(@" GS USE ICU == 1");
>>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to my program, and effectively, the display appeared:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-09-14 11:04:41.625 TM1[79500:100088]  GS USE ICU == 1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried debugging, but from a recent conversation on this list, it
>>>>>>> seems I need a port gdb80, that is not present in my FreeBSD 11.0 ports
>>>>>>> directory  (have got gdb and gdb66).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I must be missing something obvious, but for now, I'm rather stuck.
>>>>>>> Problems like this make one feel utterly stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would you have any suggestions left?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (I already reinstalled the icu and gnustep base ports, no errors
>>>>>>> detected, no change in the result).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Edwin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to