ned, 3. pro 2017. u 11:17 David Chisnall <[email protected]> napisao je:
> > That said, I’d be far more inclined to suggest that we depend on > Objective-C++ and libobjc2 than clang. GSIMap, for example, is quite > painful to use and would be a lot cleaner in C++. In other code bases, I > can simply do things like std::unordered_map<int, id __weak> and all of the > memory management works correctly. Before we had reliable ARC support, I > had some C++ strong_object and weak_object wrappers that called the > relevant runtime functions in their constructors and destructors (and, for > weak, implemented an implicit cast operator to a strong object type that > called the function to materialise a strong reference). I am not a fan of C++. I’d be okay with this only if it meant no regressions in output code size and, more importantly, compile times. -- Sent from Gmail Mobile on iPad
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
