I know that I likely start a flame war, but watching the discussion from an elevated point of view...
> Am 25.11.2019 um 10:30 schrieb Gregory Casamento <[email protected]>: > * Compatibility, much of the API is moving towards using blocks. Blocks *ARE > NOT SUPPORTED* on GCC and aren't likely to be anytime in the near future. Hm, where has our own creativity gone? Fred mentioned that it could be possible to define some block wrapper macros if some time is invested. It that works out, we do not make our decisions depend on gcc *not* implementing something. So this argument for moving to clang looks more like an excuse that we do not work on our own gcc compatible solution, isn't it? -- hns
