Hi Gregory,
On 2020-07-10 17:52:39 +0200 Gregory Casamento
<[email protected]> wrote:
As mailing list moderator, I need to point out that this discussion
is now
about failing tests in base, not porting apps, so it should be moved
to a
new thread.
GC
Sorry, it is done now.
Patrick.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:04 AM Fred Kiefer <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Patrick,
all the three test that fail for you seem to be internet related. Is
it
possible that form the machine where these tests are run no external
network connection is possible? If this is that case please ignore
the
failing tests.
Fred
Am 10.07.2020 um 16:31 schrieb Patrick Cardona <
[email protected]>:
On 2020-07-10 15:59:20 +0200 Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> wrote:
Am 10.07.2020 um 15:25 schrieb Patrick Cardona via Discussion
list for
the GNUstep programming environment <[email protected]>:
Just a thing I noted : if you run 'make test' with the new
gnustep-base, some tests are failing. It might be something RFM
could look
at too.
Patrick, if you have failing tests for GNUstep base you should
report
these. Nobody else knows which tests are failing for you nor why
this is
the case. We are using Travis on GitHub and there all tests for base
seem
to pass. Please report back the failing test and be sure to include
the
test.log file with the details for these test.
Here is a brief :
(...)
base/GSXML/basci.m:184
Failed test: basic.m:184 ... empty plist is not valid
2020-07-10 10:54:58.406 basic[10942:10942] unable to find GNUstep
DTD -
'plist-$at line: 1 column: 95 ... failed to load HTTP resource
(...)
base/NSException/basic:404
We expect a single FAIL without any explanation as
the test is terminated by an uncaught exception ...
/usr/GNUstep/System/Tools/gnustep-tests : ligne 404 : 18483 Abandon
$RUN_CMD
Completed file: basic.m
I join the log and the sum files too.
