Congratulations !
Le 17 mars 2025 17:36:34 GMT+01:00, Yavor Doganov <[email protected]> a écrit : >On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 09:15:08 +0200, >Yavor Doganov wrote: >> 2025-03-15 - Milestone 1 - Transition and toolchain freeze > >We are in the business. The next Debian stable release will ship with >Base 1.31.1, GUI/Back 0.32.0, Gorm 1.5.0, GWorkspace 1.1.0 and >Addresses 0.5.0. (Addresses caught the last train; it was uploaded on >17th of February but was accepted by the FTP masters on 9th of March.) > >Many thanks to all the people who worked tirelessly to match the tight >deadline and of course to all those who contributed to the releases. >Special thanks to Richard for fixing very quickly a gnustep-base issue >on s390x [1] which was beyond my humble abilities. > >The new graphviz-based autogsdoc feature looks great and it works >very well. One downside is the increased package size: > >gnustep-base-doc: +28.5 MB >gnustep-gui-doc: +57.2 MB > >I don't think that's so important these days. Another problem (not >exactly a problem but a discrepancy that puzzles me) is that the >output in the Debian packages differs from the generated documentation >at gnustep.org. > >On gnustep.org, a typical diagram shows the superclass in blue font >and the subclass in green font (both cells in grey backround): > > ,---------. > | NSCoder | > `---------' > | > v >,------------. >| NSArchiver | >`------------' > >The Debian-generated documentation has both classes with black font >and with grey background. Links work, including cross-manual ones, >it's just a visual difference. Is it because Debian has (old) >graphviz/2.42.4 or it's due to some custom CSS at gnustep.org? Either >way, this is not something important, I just wondered why. > >[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnustep/2025-02/msg00000.html > > -- sent using e/os
