As fun as this is, it unfortunately underscores the IP lobby's stance that
the introduction of new TLD's must be heavily managed and controlled, with
preferential treatment given to the trademark holders whose "rights" would
be infringed had this been a real TLD being administered on a "first come
first serve" basis (RFC1591 be damned).
It's too bad really. Human nature and the general mismanagement of the
namespace to date makes this an almost intractable problem.
My 0.02
-mark
P.S. the only one I grabbed was easydns.moo
At 12:48 AM 8/2/00 +0100, Abhishek Rungta wrote:
>ME ! with ICANN.MOO and guess what ??
>netsol.moo and networksolution.moo :)
>Something to feel delighted ;) isn't it.
>
>I have got my share of pleasure and happiness.
>Rest for you all guys.
>
>Abhishek Rungta
>Indus Net Technologies
>Phone : 91-33-2201718 2210896
>http://www.talash.net
>! Outsource your web development to us !
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Doytchin Spiridonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Abhishek Rungta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Marc Schneiders
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 1:16 AM
>Subject: Re: .moo !!
>
>
>> ah that was you who got go.moo !!! i just wondered who to blow up :)))))
>>
>> regards,
>> doytchin
>>
>> p.s. also i noticed sex.moo etc. were the first not available domain names
>> ;)
>> p.p.s. anyone with icann.moo ? :))
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Abhishek Rungta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Marc Schneiders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 12:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: .moo !!
>>
>>
>> > Hey Guys,
>> >
>> > The .moo stuff has been real entertainer. You have kept upto your
>promise
>> of
>> > starting this "fun" stuff.
>> > We got all the pleasure of registering domains which we dreamt to get
>some
>> > day ;)
>> > For example I managed go.moo and opensrs.moo *wink* (copyright
>> > infringement).
>> >
>> > I hope this grows.
>> > any chance we can get .moo aliased to our real domain names. Seems to be
>a
>> > good idea :)
>> > I know it will be limited to the number of ISP's who might be interested
>> in
>> > adopting this idea, but some light hearted fun in the industry full of
>> > *problems* should be good.
>> >
>> > What do you guys think..
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Abhishek Rungta
>> > Indus Net Technologies
>> > Phone : 91-33-2201718 2210896
>> > http://www.talash.net
>> > ! Outsource your web development to us !
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Marc Schneiders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: Abhishek Rungta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 8:20 PM
>> > Subject: Re: .moo !!
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Abhishek Rungta wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > 220 domains registered in 15-20 mins !
>> > > > grand begining :)
>> > > > keep it up.
>> > >
>> > > 220? I stopped at 100 :-)
>> > >
>> > > I noticed single character names are not acceptable. Why is that?
>> > >
>> > > Does OpenSRS really wants this site flooded? Maybe add a whois
>interface
>> > > then, so we can see who got what :-)
>> > >
>> > > I might even set up a game page on one of my sleeping
>> > > names: dotconq.com. I'd do it on dot.moo, which I own, if it worked of
>> > > course.
>> > > Or will OpenSRS delete my RSP acoount if I do any such thing?
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > My best domain name? The latest! - http://www.anarX.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
----
Mark Jeftovic, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
easyDNS Technologies Inc. http://www.easyDNS.com/
