>> in OpenSRS's best interest to "not care" about which
>> RSP actually adds domain years
Not really.
>> For them, it's not important.
This is probably a more accurate assessment. But since it "sucks" (your
words) for RSPs, then it's *NOT* in OpenSRS's best interests. Keeping RSPs
happy keeps them as RSPs which in turn increases the number of years sold.
OpenSRS has consistently shown that they understand that what's good for
RSPs is good for them, and they back it up with action.
As a direct result of the feedback on this list, Scott has committed to
making changes to the renewal mechanism to avoid this.
Regards,
Eric Longman
Atl-Connect Internet Services
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net |
| 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 |
| Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
----- Original Message -----
From: "dnsadmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject: RE: renewals + notification
BTW, it is in OpenSRS's best interest to "not care" about which RSP actually
adds domain years to an expiring domain.
A domain year from RSP A, B, or C usually costs the same ($10) -- so if you
get cheated out the deal, and I manage to renew your domains -- OpenSRS gets
paid the same.
For us, it sucks. For them, it's not important.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Goodman
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 5:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: renewals + notification
>
>
>
> Ok. I just read some posts on the lists. I didn't realize this was
> actually the way it works. Not only will I look pretty dumb, but I might
> as well throw out any data I have for projecting income for this year. I
