This is a known fact. The profile is not created until you complete the
first domain registration. If you don't have your account set to register
instantly (instead of pending), they will all end up in separate profiles.
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Steve Hsieh wrote:
> I am testing out batch registrations in the test environment, and have experienced
>the following problem:
>
> If I do a batch registration and select an existing domain profile, then everything
>works as expected.
>
> However, if I do a batch registration and enter a new domain profile, the domains
>are *not* linked together. However, my reading of the sample reg_system code is that
>they should be.
>
> Example: try registering domaina.com, domaina.net, and domaina.org
> When asked for a profile, create a new one: newuser, newpass, newpass
>
> Now approve the registration and go to manage domains. Logging in as domaina.com, I
>am unable to see domaina.net and domaina.org unless I explicity change the linking.
>
> However, had I batch registered and select an existing profile, then everything
>links properly.
>
> Can someone else test a batch registration on the test system using a new domain
>registration and see if they link properly? I need to know if it's something that
>I've done that has caused this to break or not.
>
> Debugging the %data associative array that is passed to send_cmd, I see the
>following:
>
> domaina.com: count is 1, link_domains is 1, data{link_domains} is 1,
>data{master_order_id} is
> domaina.net: count is 2, link_domains is 1, data{link_domains} is 0,
>data{master_order_id} is 100478
> domaina.org: count is 3, link_domains is 1, data{link_domains} is 0,
>data{master_order_id} is 100478
>
> So domaina.com is registered and link_domains is 1. This domain is assigned order ID
>100478 and the latter two domains are registered with master_order_id set to the
>correct value. So why aren' the latter two domains linked?
>
> And why does reg_system set link_domains=0 for the second two? (the code does this,
>but I want to know why). I didn't see any explanation of the linking methodology in
>the developers documentation.
>
> Thanks
>
>
