>> No, seriously, does Tucows want this thoroughly tested? With a lot more
>> than 1171 orders in one day? Are there any plans for that?
>> If not any objections to someone else putting it up on a one page website?
>> (No adds etc., just because business is low because of the holidays.)
>
>It's actually been quite extensively tested to the tune of thousands of
>transactions per minute. We're quite confident that it represents the
>state of the art as it relates to scalability and reliability. The core
>services are pretty generic and common at this point and the upgrade path
>gives us orders of magnitude beyond current capabilities without changing
>the code, interrupting operations or otherwise inconveniencing our
>clientele.
>
>IOTW, drop it in, let's see what happens in the wild.
and
>There is a fine line between beating on it and pummelling it to death
>however. Personally, I'm rather enjoying watching the abuse come our way.
>Even with the limited hardware that we've deployed (note, we're certainly
>not talking about a farm of RS/6000's here), I'm quite pleased to see that
>we're standing up to the abuse.
>
>The upshot is that the currently deployment is well suited to running a
>small registry on the current hardware - I had originally thought that we
>had underpowered the system by running it all off of one box (appserver,
>two DBM's, etc)...it turns out that the system can be far more economical
>than originally thought.
I'm curious if you can talk about the OpenXRS system, how it's designed,
what the .moo services are deployed on, etc.
I read a reference on the OpenXRS description page that made it sound like
it's a Java Server platform of one kind or another, but would be curious to
the architectural details.
I'm also wondering if it means you might offer an OpenSRS client
implementation in Java (since it would save me doing it myself ;-).
Thanks!
Michael
--
What have YOU done for Keyser S�ze lately?
---
Michael A. Alderete
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> voice: (415) 861-5758
<http://www.alderete.com/>
