I think the discussion always fell along the lines of "Yeah, some people ARE going to be able to use the non-RFC syntax, but that doesn't mean that the non-RFC syntax (a) is right, or (b) will work for everyone." And was there any reason you quoted, in its entirety, an entire message completely unrelated to your message. I can understand hitting "r" to reply to a message, being too lazy to want to type out the recipients (I do it myself quite often), but generally speaking its good form to remove the non-related message you're "replying to").... D At 3:19 AM +0300 8/6/00, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote: >hm i discovered something.. >do all of you remember the discussion about [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the rfc? > >ok. now rfc 2396 says: > hostname = *( domainlabel "." ) toplabel [ "." ] > domainlabel = alphanum | alphanum *( alphanum | "-" ) alphanum > toplabel = alpha | alpha *( alphanum | "-" ) alphanum > >you could check now this url which is my homepage: >http://$$$.dods.net/ > >(no comments)
