Hi Alexxx
He knows that. That's why he qualified it with "for all intents and
purposes". Don't pay too much attention.
I've raised the same point in my postings today. My wording was:
> It is NOT true to claim that the Admin Contact (the defacto owner) is the
> same as the Registrant (the real owner) as you would not need to have two
> separate fields.
G'night.
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Kells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:50 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: What to do against a Registrar who abuses his position?
> But that is not the case... the owner of a domain name is whoever is
listed
> in the WHOIS as the REGISTRANT. The admin contact is the person who gets
> contacted in regards to administrative matters...
>
> Registrant and Admin contact are separate. They do not have to be one and
> the same!
>
> Alex
>
> --
> Alex Kells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Frontier Internet Hostmaster
> Frontier Internet Services Limited http://www.frontier-internet.ltd.uk
> Tel: 020 7510 4713 Fax: 020 7531 9930
> All statements made are subject to Frontier's Terms and
> Conditions of Business which are available upon request.
>
> *** The views expressed in this email are wholly my own and do not reflect
> those of my employer ***
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William X. Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 00:32
>
> <snip>
>
> Because of exactly what I said above. The Admin contact is for all
> intents and purposes the owner of the domain name.
>
> <snip>
>
