Could OpenSRS block maxis.net.my, please?
Now it is pretending it is userfriendly.com
See below.
--
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
Marc Schneiders --- http://bodacious-tatas.org: no not what you think
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from opensrs.org ([216.40.33.61])
by s025.widexs.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e8PJsNg23418
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 21:54:24 +0200
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
by opensrs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA20531
for discuss-list-outgoing; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:56:50 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: opensrs.org: majordomo set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from rly-mx1.maxis.net.my (rly-mx1.maxis.net.my
[202.75.130.117])
by opensrs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20523
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:56:48 -0400
Received: from rly-mx1.maxis.net.my ([202.75.130.117]) by
rly-mx1.maxis.net.my with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.467.46);
Tue, 26 Sep 2000 01:59:46 +0800
Received: from ( [172.16.1.116]) by with SMTP (MailShield v2.0 - WIN32
Aug 7 2000 16:39:09); Tue,
26 Sep 2000 01:59:43 +0800
Received: from userfriendly.com ([203.121.38.92]) by mail4.maxis.net.my
with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.467.46);
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:44:05 +0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:59:30 +0800
From: Andy Motes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Return expired domain to the available pool
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SMTP-HELO: mail4.maxis.net.my
X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: [172.16.1.116]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Bob's Lists wrote:
> Is it perhaps the case that Netsol ARE paying for the 'next year' of the
> domain, pre-empting receipt of payment from the previous
registrant? Even
> so, there would be no sense in them continuing to pay the registry for a
> domain from which they in turn were receiving no payments unless,
indeed, it
> was their intention to hold it hostage (making the previous suggestion
of
NetSol is actually not paying for the "next year" but rather blocking
customers
of its competitors (registrars like Tucows,etc) from registering those
expiried
names.
I did try to register one NSI expiried name with DotRegistrar but I got
the
error "domain not available", but when I phoned NSI and asked them
whether
I can register that domain, they said yes if I paid USD190 registrant
name
change, but USD70 for 2 years registration fee, which I did and now I
own
that domain.
> Furthermore even if this IS the case, it makes absolutely NO sense for
them
> to not sell it to someone else after the previous registrant's lease
> expired. Are we to believe that they are keeping it 'because they paid
for
> it'? If I was a shareholder I'd be pretty concerned about them wasting
my
> money thus.
>
NetSol will NEVER release expiried domains to its competitor's customers
(which you are), but if you are their customer, yes, you can buy back
the
expiried domain.
> What's the OpenSRS policy on this, will the domains be registerable by
> someone else if the present registrant lets it expire?
>
No, OpenSRS keeps holding the domain just like Netsol does. In fact, I
let one
of my OpenSRS registered domains expiry because I did not want it, and
Tucows
is still holding it even after 270 days!
Now, how do I get Tucows release my name back into the registry so I can
register it with ENOM?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
Marc Schneiders --- http://bodacious-tatas.org: no not what you think
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
