In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] m writes: >Saturday, October 21, 2000, 12:24:34 AM, you wrote: > >> I suddenly feel the burden to argue with you lifted as I see > >You just don't know when you have lost. Why are you quoting a previous message for the second time? >I see that now, I'll not respond to any more of your little rants. This is what we were after all along. *THANK YOU!!!* And that is most certainly NOT sarcastic. >Go file your little lawsuit, I'll be the one in the front row >snickering when you are ordered to pay NSI's legal fees. What lawsuit? For the third time VI, this thread is about some other guy who ALREADY HAS filed a lawsuit. We know you're slow and all, but this is getting absurd! One mo' time... I started the "Network Sol Legal Probs" thread. Some guy asking about a suit that was RECENTLY FILED started this one. -Cengiz
Re: Re[12]: NSI getting sued? For cybersquatting?
Domain Registration Role Account Sat, 21 Oct 2000 01:59:01 -0700
- Re: Re[15]: NSI get... Domain Registration Role Account
- RE: Re[10]: NSI get... Rodney Payne
- Re: Re[10]: NSI get... Domain Registration Role Account
- Re[12]: NSI getting... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[8]: NSI gett... Rodney Payne
- Re[10]: NSI getting... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[8]: NSI gett... Domain Registration Role Account
- Re[10]: NSI getting... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[10]: NSI get... Domain Registration Role Account
- Re[12]: NSI getting... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[12]: NSI get... Domain Registration Role Account
- Re: Re[12]: NSI get... Swerve
- Re: Re[12]: NSI get... Charles Daminato
- RE: Re[8]: NSI gett... Bob's Lists
- Re: Re[8]: NSI gett... Domain Registration Role Account
- Re: Re[2]: NSI getting sued? For cyb... adam
- Re: NSI getting sued? For cybersquatting? adam
