Are domains in the .Vc zone file considered to be valid and be usable by
their current owners?
Any ball park on retail/wholesale price?
swerve
> From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:00:03 -0500
> To: "Swerve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Fagyal Csongor"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Lee Hodgson - DomainGuideBook.com"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: dotVC coming our way?
>
> We have to determine under what conditions these domains were 'promised'
> before we allow them to be fully registered. Since there are some
> registrars (non-sanctioned) that are offering these names we may not even be
> given records of some previous registrations and the respective registrant
> information associated therein.
>
> Potential ideas being whisked around is a 're-registration' period for the
> few holders that previously purchased domains - and that we have records of.
>
> --
>
> Charles Daminato
> Tucows Product Manager (ccTLDs)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to
> time that nothing worth knowing can be taught.
>
> - Oscar Wilde
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Swerve
> Sent: November 28, 2000 10:40 AM
> To: Fagyal Csongor; Lee Hodgson - DomainGuideBook.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: dotVC coming our way?
>
>
> I am quite confident that domains already registered will be honoured.
>
> swerve
>
>> From: "Fagyal Csongor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Organization: CO
>> Reply-To: "Fagyal Csongor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 15:45:07 +0100
>> To: "Lee Hodgson - DomainGuideBook.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: dotVC coming our way?
>>
>>> I know domain speculators that have been registering .VC names for many
>>> months. Will these still be valid?
>> Why wouldn't they be? I mean .VC is a valid ccTLD which resolves - or am I
>> mistaken?
>>
>> - Cs.
>>
>>
>
>
