At 1/16/01 12:06 PM, JB Segal wrote:
>I know that one reseller's modified their version of the code, unfortunately,
>the same use of a hash that causes a list of bulk_<foo> domains to be
>processed
>in random order causes said reseller's NS changes to happen in a seemingly
>Different random order for each domain processed.
>(IE: If you were to say: "For all domains do: NS1 primary, NS2 secondary1,
>NS3 secondary2, NS4 secondary3" you may well get
>domain1: NS2, NS4, NS3, NS1
>domain2: NS3, NS1, NS2, NS4
You do know that the order is purely cosmetic and doesn't affect how your
name servers are accessed, right?
If the cosmetic display bugs you, and you want them to show in, say,
alphabetical order, you could add some code to sort the hash before
submitting or displaying it.
--
Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies
