I feel the same way.
I was looking forward to offering these names until discovering the
whacked pricing model dotTV has decided on. I stay away from complicated
pricing schemes with my own offerings, so I'm staying away from this one.
I wouldn't actually purchase one of these domains myself. I don't do any
television or television related sites, and despite dotTV's advertising
dotTV screams "old fashioned media" rather than "net of the future".
-scott
Oscar Petoskey wrote:
> Ditto here, I have a strong prejudice against being "ripped-off".
> Just go ahead and forget *.tv right now.
>
> Oscar
> RocketNet
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 1/30/01 at 3:45 PM Chuck Hatcher wrote:
>
>> Those are "high profile" names? I'm not even going to bother implementing
>> .tv domains!
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tiger Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 3:03 PM
>> Subject: Incorrect Displayed Prices for High Profile .tv Domains
>>
>>
>>> When I request a "high profile" .tv name, the price shown in the initial
>>> OpenSRS RSP message is different than the price shown when I continue to
>>> the dotTV Web site.
>>>
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> monkeys.tv shows $450 from OpenSRS and $1000 from dotTV
>>> spiders.tv shows $675 from OpenSRS and $460 from dotTV
>>> testicles.tv shows $125 from OpenSRS and $390 from dotTV
>>>
>>> Somethin' ain't right...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies
>>>
>>>
