We've never really had to follow through on something like this with CIRA; I
don't really know where our responsibility begins and ends yet. I would
think a reasonable first step would be for us to ask the reseller (assuming
the domain in question is currently owned by one of our MSP's customers) to
ask the client directly for proof or an explanation. The trouble, I suspect,
is that we might get an answer which seems plausible, but it impossible for
US to investigate.
HOWEVER, these are legal waters, replete with sharks, and it may be that we
haven't the power to be effective here.
I will look into it, and follow up.
Thanks,
Ken
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jo Shea - Danjo
> Creations
> Sent: February 8, 2001 11:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: .ca - What is the use of having eligibility
> requirements??????????
>
>
> When I inquired to support about launching " an investigation as to the
> registrant's eligibility to a
> Canadian name? " Frank answered back " review the CIRA resolution
> policy, and see what avenues are open to you to dispute the registration.
> There is at least one dispute resolution company (e-resolution in
> montreal)
> that
> serves Canada. "
>
> My customer just told me " The fees came from the schedule at eresolution
> (see below). I was assuming
> I'd need a 3-person panel, which costs $2900 US for 1-2 domain names.
> http://www.eresolution.com/services/dnd/schedule.htm#composition "
>
>
>
> Did she miss a step? Can she do this without hiring a dispute resolution
> company?
>
> Jo Shea
> Danjo Creations
> [.com] [.net] [.org] [.ca] [.co.uk] [.org .uk] [and very soon .tv]
> Leave Network Solutions in the dust!
> http://danjocreations.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Joy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: .ca - What is the use of having eligibility
> requirements??????????
>
>
> Hey, that's fascinating. Who told your client that?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken
>
> >
>
