Hello Tiger,
This is partially why I asked for a list of current priorities on the
RSP-RSP transfer thread.
I, like you, believe that there are many things on the priority list
that should not be priorities over things such as RSP-RSP transfers
and other issues, such as the transaction audit trail feature.
But we can only speculate on that, since we can't seem to get a firm
answer from anyone at OpenSRS about where things are in the priority
of things.
Saturday, March 03, 2001, 1:25:59 PM, Tiger Technologies wrote:
> At 3/3/01 5:12 AM, Chuck Hatcher wrote:
>>Since OpenSRS is notified every time a domain name is transferred to another
>>registrar, it seems logical that this could be taken care of at that level,
>>rather than by each and every RSP.
>>
>>How about it, OpenSRS, can you take a break from working on non-functional
>>multi-lingual domains long enough to clean up some glaring defects in your
>>core business?
> Yeah. I first pointed out this problem last August 18th, saying that it
> would lead to exactly the same billing problem NSI had:
> http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0008/0638.html
> Scott Allan replied that a solution was in the works.
> Since then, people have complained almost weekly on this list about how
> evil NSI is for continuing to bill domains that had been transferred
> months before, etc. At one point, there was a big groundswell of support
> for trying to get NSI's accreditation revoked or filing a class-action
> lawsuit.
> Oh, look -- it turns out OpenSRS (i.e., each RSP) does the same thing.
> OpenSRS has known about it for six months and still hasn't implemented
> the relatively trivial fix to flag domains that have been transferred
> away.
> I know I sound like a broken record, but the current state of affairs is
> appalling. OpenSRS has been aware of many of these urgent issues for
> months, if not a year. Look at this message:
> http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0006/0213.html
> OpenSRS staff knew last June that there would be a big problem if
> automated RSP transfers were not implemented before renewals were in
> progress, but the issue was ignored while huge resources were allocated
> to projects like multilingual domains (which in their current
> implementation are nothing more than a scheme to prey on the ignorant or
> accommodate those hoping to make a quick buck on land-rush speculation).
> I'm annoyed. Every company makes mistakes and has problems; that's not
> what I'm complaining about. The problem is (and has been, for the last
> year) that OpenSRS ignores known problems rather than fixing them.
> When are things going to change?
> --
> Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies
--
Best regards,
William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
