So are air-quality issues, since all RSPs are humans and need to breath.
But as I understand discussion lists, they're usually about a specific
*topic*, not a specific type of person (ie: RSPs).  I'm not trying to be a
grumpy bastard, just trying to get my mailbox down to a dull roar.  From
the OpenSRS website:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] - A general interest discussion list concerning a
variety of subjects related to OpenSRS. 

'nuff said...

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Swerve wrote:

> I read all threads on opensrs about domain name ownership issues.
> it's very relevant to rsp's, imo.
> 
> swerve
> 
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:52:54 -0500 (EST)
> > To: Loren Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Re: [RE: [Cyber-Squatting??? HU?]]]
> > 
> > On 16 Mar 2001, Loren Stocker wrote:
> > 
> >> As far a relevance ("die, thread..."), we are all potential Victims
> >> (end-uses)
> >> or Witnesses (Registrars). Everyone in this business has to deal the constant
> >> and growing threat of the self-serving and over-reaching the WIPO community.
> >> Next, it may be domain holders with a geographical name like me!
> > 
> > One of us is getting our threads crossed...I thought this was the thread
> > where the victim was screwed out of his Gold's Gym membership, and decided
> > to register his domain.  I thought this list was for discussion of opensrs
> > specific issues.
> > 
> > I'm on enough other lists where general domain disputes not pertaining
> > to the registrar (such as Jack's, which was pertaining directly to opensrs
> > practice) can and are being discussed. I'll bet most ISPs are...
> > 
> > James Smallacombe        PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]           http://3.am
> > =========================================================================
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

James Smallacombe                     PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                     http://3.am
=========================================================================

Reply via email to