On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:03:01AM -0400, Robert Rivers wrote:
> This is my personal opinion, ignore the opensrs.org Email for a minute
> :)
>
> Complete redundancy would involve 2 completely separate systems in two
> completely separate locations. Switches, servers, databases and the
> people to maintain it all.
>
> Anybody willing to pay $20/domain? Didn't think so :)
Full redundancy doesn't automatically mean double the cost.
Even if it did... of the current $10, $6 goes to NSI, right? So at worst
it'd be $14 per domain.
But, part of the design is what is the minimum set of features needed
in an outage situation.
Initial thoughts (without doing any of the discussion with techies/management)
- baby webserver - "we're currently having major problems with our production
environment."
- dns server - so the critical stuff still works
- backup MX, so mail is in your control, and you can flip a switch to be
able to read the mail off the MX
--
John Payne http://www.sackheads.org/jpayne/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sackheads.org/uce/ Fax: +44 870 0547954
To send me mail, use the address in the From: header
