I'm not a policy guy, but I know the contracts are as they are because by
ICANN mandate they primarily have to be. Keep in mind that the contracts
are ever evolving to protect your interests, the registrants interests, and
ours with ICANN. We're doing what we can :)
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product Manager
Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl
> Sent: June 7, 2001 2:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Contracts (non-related banter!)
>
>
> > It's nice to know SOMEONE reads the contracts :) :) :)
> >
>
> Charles, isn't there a possibility to avoid the explicit naming of
> Tucows and it's address and email in those exhibits? I mean, it isn't
> necessary in the one for com domains, so why for some others?
> Wouldn't it be as effective if we have a contract with you and the
> registrant with us, to the point that he writes to us and we write to
> you instead that he needs to write to you (as the exhibit suggests
> but possibly none of our customers will ever do).
>
>
> Kai
>
> --
>
> Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
> IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
> ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
>
>
>
