But where were you looking, pure RRP (and do you have proof) or via another
Registrar's tools (which could have been the problem)?
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product Manager
Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taco Scargo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: June 19, 2001 5:07 PM
> To: Charles Daminato
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Verisign woes....
>
>
> Charles,
>
> Not completely true... Verisign corrected these domains earlier
> on today...
> When I checked them early in the morning (european time) they were dropped
> to 1900 ...
>
> Taco
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 20:03
> Subject: RE: Verisign woes....
>
>
> > I've spoken to VeriSign regarding this, and they have no domains (that
> > they've discovered) with any dates in the past for expiry (i.e. 1900).
> The
> > domains given thus far for examples have no history of dropping
> down to a
> > lower expiry date at the Registry level. It would appear this is a
> problem
> > with the current Registrar (which isn't us).
> >
> > Charles Daminato
> > OpenSRS Product Manager
> > Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Daminato
> > > Sent: June 19, 2001 12:45 PM
> > > To: Alex Kells; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: Verisign woes....
> > >
> > >
> > > VeriSign is "investigating" - if anyone else has reports,
> please send me
> > > names (esPECIAlly if they're OpenSRS domains) so I can verifiy on
> > > our side,
> > > and give info to VeriSign.
> > >
> > > Charles Daminato
> > > OpenSRS Product Manager
> > > Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Kells
> > > > Sent: June 19, 2001 12:26 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: RE: Verisign woes....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would definitely like to hear the outcome of this - I haven't had
> any
> > > > phonecalls from angry customers, so I don't know if any of our
> > > > domains have
> > > > been effected... but I'm sure plenty of other peopel would like
> > > > to know more
> > > > about this
> > > >
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Taco Scargo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: 19 June 2001 16:37
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Verisign woes....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here is what happened:
> > > >
> > > > The VeriSign Global Registry (formarly NSI) was having a
> problem with
> > > > getting the "leap year" calendar worked out. Yesterday they
> > > thought they
> > > > had fixed the issue, with the leap year problem last light (they
> were
> > > > inadvertendly dropping a day on expiration). However, their
> > > "fix" changed
> > > > many thousands of domains to expiration dates of 1900, which
> > > then meant
> > > > some registrars deleted them because they were showing as expired.
> > > >
> > > > I had two domains affected (not registered through OpenSRS
> > > though) that I
> > > > know of.
> > > > Chuck, do you know if OpenSRS domains were affected as well ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Taco Scargo
> > >
> >
>
