The reason why the filters aren't working properly (mine included) is
because chuck decided to let majordomo use any damn tld it wanted to...I was
happy with it working on just .org ;)

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jack Broughton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: OpenSRS.com/net/org? (WAS: Tucows certs at tucows sites)


> Odd, I tend to send to ORG (after all, I mainly setup the lists, and
> administered them for a good portion of time)...
>
> Now, when I reply to all, well... let the TLDs fall where they may
> (*cough*)
>
> Charles Daminato
> TUCOWS Product Manager
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jack Broughton wrote:
>
> > Hey Team,
> >
> > I'm finding this disussion a little comical about the philosophical
> > distinctions for the 3 suffixes at OpenSRS. (.COM/NET/ORG).
> >
> > Know why that would be?  When I joined this list I created a little
> > Netscrape mail filter to plunk all these discuss-list profundities into
> > a separate folder.  Much to my surprise I found a large percentage of my
> > maillist stuff wasn't being filtered properly.  A quick investigation
> > led me to the discovery that a whack of folks were sending to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the rest were sending to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes... I've fixed my filter now thanks.)
> >
> > While the unwashed masses in the ranks of RSP-dom can be excused for a
> > lack of uniformity I am surprised that the powers that be at odds on
> > this issue.  (Chuckles Daminato seems to prefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > whilst Kenneth Joy is an ORG man. :)
> >
> > Tell me... is this more of the open sores of which Ross speaks? :)
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > Charles Daminato wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, but legacy attitudes prevail.  As Ross said - something to do
with
> > > open sores...
> > >
> > > Charles Daminato
> > > TUCOWS Product Manager
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Derek Balling wrote:
> > >
> > > > Except that e-mail addresses belong to people at the COMpany,
> > > > (they're paid, right?).
> > > >
> > > > I can understand the net/com distinction, but the only place .org
> > > > should have in the equation is to prevent someone from
cybersquatting
> > > > it. There is nothing about Tucows/OpenSRS that "doesn't fit
> > > > elsewhere" (as, paraphrased, the RFC puts it)... OpenSRS is a
network
> > > > services provider (.NET), as well as a commercial entrprise (.COM).
> > > >
> > > > D
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 12:39 PM -0400 6/25/01, Charles Daminato wrote:
> > > > >Well, initially we had three parts to OpenSRS:
> > > > >
> > > > >opensrs.org - the website, information, and staff working at the
> > > > >"Org"anization
> > > > >opensrs.net - the servers and backend for the "Net"work
> > > > >opensrs.com - for anything involving the "Com"pany
> > > > >
> > > > >Ross felt it appropriate (and I agree) to use these TLDs for their
> > > > >intended purpose, or at least as close as possible.
> > > > >
> > > > >So, email addresses end in org, servers end in net, and other stuff
ends
> > > > >in com :)
> > > > >
> > > > >Charles Daminato
> > > > >TUCOWS Product Manager
> > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Philippe Landau wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>  it's great to have such fast support now on the list, thanks
OpenSRS staff.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>  >> That's not funny...
> > > > >>  >>
https://landrush.opensrs.net/info/index.cgi?action=prereg_info
> > > > >>  >> i receive "unrecognized certificate" warning both on IE
4.72.3110.4
> > > > >>  >> and NN 4.7 and on Opera 5.01. Is this a normal situation for
all
> > > > >>  >> Tucows certs or site was not properly configured ?
> > > > >>  >That's odd, it works fine for me - this is a signed Cert from
Entrust,
> > > > >>  >checking the details will show you that.  *hrm...*
> > > > >>  my NN 4.08 mac says:
> > > > >>  "Netscape does not recognize the signer of this Certificate,
> > > > >>  you may decide to accept it anyway..."
> > > > >>
> > > > >>  something else: is there a reason for the apparent preference to
use
> > > > >>  OpenSRS.org over OpenSRS.net ? it seems unnecessarily misleading
to me.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>  kind regards     philippe, http://InternetRoot.com
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+
> > > > | [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | "Conan! What is best in life?"          |
> > > > |  Derek J. Balling   | "To crush your enemies, see them        |
> > > > |                     |    driven before you, and to hear the   |
> > > > |                     |    lamentation of their women!"         |
> > > > +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to