> - should we introduce handles that would work across profiles (essentially,
> you can assign a role to a handle, and then modify that handle as necessary)
yes
> - if we were to increase the power of certain roles (technical contact
> control of NS's for example), how should we introduce this? How should we
> deal with legacy roles of this type - extend them the same power
> automagically, or require that they specifically ask for the new role type
Probably automagically, otherwise it will probably produce too much hazzle.
However, it should be possible to "opt" in or out of the extra permissions for
a profile owner. (That means, if a profile owner doesn't want this, he should
be able to prohibit this, in general or domain-by-domain, whatever you seem
fit to implement.)
> - how important would providing support for existing handles at other
> registries be? would it be worth supporting this considering the large
> complexities it would introduce to development?
>
You mean a re-use of a handle from NSI or so? I think that's not important.
Kai
--
Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
