Hey - This is a sore spot for us because we had hoped to have this out by now. Suffice it to say we have gotten other things done... this is on the map for specification in September. This means we will get it to dev late in the month, and it could take anywhere from 4-8 weeks to develop, test, and extend this functionality. We will be seeking reseller input in designing this functionality - stay tuned to discuss list for a draft spec. We are committed to doing this. Note that worrying about you names being stolen is like worrying about getting hit by a car when you cross the street, it rarely happens. If and when it happens, the most damage (which we recognize as bad) is a small period where service for this name do not work. The name is always restored to it's rightful owner (in our experiences with this), especially if it is an operational name with services attached to it. Our enhanced transfer notification now alerts registrants when a name is requested to be moved to another registrar, so, if your contact info is good, you can really mitigate your risks. We are still going to extend "locking" functionality as we do see it as having value, and revenue potential. Regards, sA At 10:30 PM 8/14/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Ross and Scott, > >With respect, > i do not understand why a lockDown system to further protect domains has >not been implemented. It would make things safer. Certain domains are >very valuable or mission critical. > >It's been almost 2 years since Domain lockdowns was considered on the to do >list. From what i have heard, other registrars offer this. > > In the long run, i will end up putting my most important domains at the >registrar with the best security. > >Is opensrs going to offer a lockdown system or not? > > If yes, what are the details and when will it be live and running? > >thanks, > >Swerve > > > From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:38:00 -0400 > > To: "Loren Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "William X Walsh" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "David Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Charles Daminato" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [Re[2]: [RE: Transfer Fraud: Who are these losers!!!!]] > > > >> Does anyone agree that we should Police this? Or, is the consensus that > >> processing fraud is OK since were're not the "victims?" > > > > I think the consensus is, at least on this side of the screen, that > > attempted fraud is irrelevant. (Okay, important, but not high enough on the > > priority list to seriously pursue). > > > > -rwr > > > > Scott Allan Director OpenSRS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
