Ross - do you understand the term trust?
I trust you.
Therefore is it not time for tucows to use it's numbers to start it's own
root server infrastructure and get that .moo off the ground.
ICANN is fucked - we all know that. So why don't you be a leader - and
stop complaining about the ICANN quango. Tucows under your leadership has
been successful. Do the same for TLD operators like myself who have to
battle the ICANN twits.
And Ross - I once heard that Tucows wanted to start a .web and apply to
ICANN for it. Don't do that - one already exists. Don't contribute to
the problem - resolve it with strength in numbers.
again - I trust you. That means something. And your a .GOD domain
owner. That makes me proud too. I still don't understand this zen thing
you've got going - but it seems to produce good results.
regards
joe
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > What's the sensational aspect of this? Does Afilias really have any right
> > to some of these .info domains? Same thing applies to NeuLevel, and (I
> > suspect)
> > the .NAME operator.
>
> Sensational?
>
> "ICANN has officially approved widespread corporate cybersquatting for new
> domain name registry operators."
>
> "However, a registrar is given free rein to select up to 10,000 domains that
> they wish to possess"
>
> "This excessive generosity..."
>
> "This revelation comes ..."
>
> "ICANN appears to have been over generous"
>
> My main rub with articles like this one is that these contracts have been
> public for a long long time and before that, the proposals were public and
> before that the debate was public....my point is, people seem incredibly
> interested in whining about perceived slights, yet didn't take the time to
> involve themselves when it mattered most.
>
> Just my own personal $0.02.
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
--
The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
http://www.dot-god.com/
