As long as your clients are aware (and agree) to you being their agent,
and you can contact them easily with your own private methods, and act as
a proxy, this causes no problems.
Charles Daminato
TUCOWS Product Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Kirk Fletcher wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Unfortunately, according to ICANN mandate, all the information has
> > to be correct and verifiable - or you may lose the domain for
> > compliance reasons. Sad, but true.
>
>
> Then perhaps we should give customers the option of selecting
> us as an "authorised agent". My accountant receives lots of
> (snail) mail directed at me (which he forwards on) - so is
> there any reason we can't do the same? We could set up a
> catch-all account for them... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> As long as we have their main address on file somewhere, we
> can match up the receipt_no to forward on their mails (this
> isn't as much work as it sounds - since very little mail
> should go to it - most is spam and can be ignored).
>
> This still satisfies ICANN rules, since the address is still
> valid - it just prevents SPAM from getting through.
>
> Kirk
>
>
>
