Here:

http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0010/0255.html

Now, *PLEASE* can we drop the annoying bickering?

Regards,
Eric Longman
Atl-Connect Internet Services

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Atl-Connect Internet Services   http://www.atlcon.net |
| 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288              770 590-0888 |
| Marietta, GA 30064-1685            [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+-------------------------------------------------------+


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Iyoha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William X Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "opensrs"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 7:15 AM
Subject: RE: Wish List


Hello William,

> Just because you can't remember it doesn't mean it wasn't made.  As
> you would say, "Brilliant argument, you can't remember the message,
> and are too lazy to go look for it, so it must not exist."
I did not say it must not exist. Stop paraphrasing ... your not very good at
it (or intentionally bad at it)
I said I kept up with the list and did not see any statements by OpenSRS
You and some others claim that such statements do exist in many places.

It stands to reason you would have a better shot finding the statements in
the archives, than me who has never seen those mythical OpenSRS statements
supporting your argument.

If anything you are the lazy one ... you keep referencing previous
statements supposedly made by OpenSRS yet you choose not to find them (or
most likely CANNOT find them)

In fact I am sure Bill looked and did not find anything. He ended up
pointing out some previous statements I made but nothing about the supposed
OpenSRS statements

> Your logic eludes me.
my logic is very simple ... sometimes simplicity confuses some people :D

I am really not trying to get into useless arguments. I guess OpenSRS can
solve this by making a public statement either way.

later

David
--
Systematic Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(513) 241 3331 ext. 9
http://www.systware.com




Reply via email to