I'm getting the same problem.... it seems like its trying to access an exit
page that doesn't exist, or perhaps they're under load to the point where
that server can't respond.
I'll try again later...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aly Ramzan
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 3:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Notification of .BIZ Intellectual Property Claim Conflict
>
>
> We have just received IP claim Conflict notification for .biz
> domains. While
> the first 2 "intent to proceed registration request" went
> through smoothly,
> for the others we are getting the following response. As requested by .BIZ
> the cookies option was enabled on our browser.
>
> Is anyone facing the same problem.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aly Ramzan
> CubeXS
>
> https://extranet.neulevel.com/services/GenericLogout.jsp?target=/h
> tml/regist
> rant/private/proceedCancel/processing.html
> Error 404--Not Found
> From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:
> 10.4.5 404 Not Found
> The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No
> indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.
>
> If the server does not wish to make this information
> available to the
> client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The
> 410 (Gone)
> status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally
> configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently
> unavailable and
> has no forwarding address.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William X Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jim Carey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 11:40 AM
> Subject: Re: IP challenges on biz
>
>
> > Friday, Friday, September 14, 2001, 10:59:22 PM, Jim Carey wrote:
> >
> > > My understanding of the IP challenge on biz is that the person
> challenged is
> > > merely warned that there is an ip registration for that name
> - correct ?
> It
> > > is then up to the claimant to proceed with a challenge.
> >
> > > There has been no validation of the claim or the IP accuracy ?
> >
> > > For example I have been challenged on australia.biz - clearly
> frivolous -
> > > how can someone have IP on a country name - and the others
> are standard
> > > dictionary words.
> >
> > Who knows with ICANN. ICANN recently passed a rule on .info I believe
> > that gives the governments of countries the rights to their
> > countryname.info domains (a policy I strongly disagree with, no make
> > that vehemently).
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Userfriendly.com Domains
> > --
> >
> >
>
