i think that's correct. the duplicate app. names could be held back for a long time. neulevel may decide to wait til after the lawsuit.
swerve > From: "ST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:54:47 -0700 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: .biz update. > > Does this mean that the notifications we received yesterday were only > for names that didn't have duplicate applications? Some of the names we > got were pretty good, and I'd be very surprised to learn that we had the > only applications for them. On the other hand, it would be great news, > because we'd still have a chance at the best names. > > ST > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 6:57 AM > To: opensrs discuss > Subject: .biz update. > > > Neulevel hasn't decided whether to release multiple name entry domains. > > http://rtnews.globetechnology.com/servlet/RTGAMArticleHTMLTemplate/C/200 > 1102 > 5/gtbiz?tf=tgam/realtime/fullstory_Tech.html&cf=globetechnology/tech-con > fig- > neutral&slug=gtbiz&date=20011025&archive=RTGAM&site=Technology > >
