Robert Rivers wrote: >> Hmmm, Not really. He's been trying to transfer it, but can't.
> >public, and in refusing to transfer domain server services to competitors. > >(The latter happened to us, promtping our interest in this issue.) Our :) Regards, Eric Longman Atl-Connect Internet Services +-------------------------------------------------------+ | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net | | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 | | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +-------------------------------------------------------+ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Rivers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:42 PM Subject: Re: Information needed for class action lawsuit against Verisign/Network Solutions Hmmm, Domain Name: TICON.NET Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Name Server: DAVINCI.TICON.NET Name Server: NEWTON.TICON.NET Updated Date: 05-nov-2001 > > >On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 00:23:21 -0800, you wrote: > > > >Hello Everyone. I've seen a lot of talk about what can be done about > >Network Solutions business practices. Well here is your chance. The more > >information they get the better... > > > >--- > > > >On behalf of two clients, Ademi & O'Reilly, Attorneys at Law, are > >investigating the practices of Network Solutions. It appears that Network > >Solutions and its parent company, Verisign, may be engaging in > >anticompetitive behavior, in refusing to release domain names to the general > >public, and in refusing to transfer domain server services to competitors. > >(The latter happened to us, promtping our interest in this issue.) Our > >impression is that Network Solutions has created unreasonable and > >unjustified obstacles to allowing transfers of services to maintain market > >share in the face of its loss of a legal monopoly. > > > >We would like the chance to discuss your experiences with Network Solutions. > >We think that many Network Solutions customers are entitled to some sort of > >refund, but we need to document how wide spread the problem is, and all of > >the factual variations involved. We would certainly appreciate your help. > > > >Robert O'Reilly, Esq. > >Ademi & O'Reilly > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] <snip>
