I'll get the docs updated (and apologies) Charles Daminato OpenSRS Product Manager Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Brown > Sent: November 29, 2001 3:09 PM > To: Charles Daminato > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: "domain taken" error on transfer requests > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Charles Daminato wrote: > > > Oh! You cannot use REGISTER for a transfer, you must use SW_REGISTER > > > > The REGISTER command (afaik) is only for new domain names. > > Then someone better update the opensrs_client_protocol_spec242.PDF file... > it says the only (well, main) difference between the two is that > REGISTER always processes orders immediately. > > "Using the register_domain action will now have the same > results as using > the sw_register action, with one major difference the > process_immediate flag will NOT be obeyed if you use the > register_domain action." > > We do want process_immediate set to false for the few orders that > may creep in through the old reg_system.cgi script, but want > immediate processing for anything through our interface... > > oh, well. If it is that simple I can just make darn sure we kill > the old reg_system.cgi script... > > -Tom > > > > > Charles Daminato > > OpenSRS Product Manager > > Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Woodcock > > > Sent: November 29, 2001 2:29 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: "domain taken" error on transfer requests > > > > > > > > > We are getting the error "domain taken" on transfer request. > > > > > > We get the correct response back from CHECK_TRANSFER. > > > > > > We use the REGISTER action to handle all our domain transactions. > > > (SW_REGISTER is not what we want.) > > > > > > The reg_type field is set to 'transfer' as it should be when > we send in > > > the transfer requests. > > > > > > Here is the content of the response we get back: > > > > > > { > > > 'transaction_id' => 'Wed Nov 28 03:49:46 > 2001_Child#4256_Request#36', > > > 'protocol' => 'XCP', > > > '_OPS_msg_id' => undef, > > > 'response_text' => 'Domain taken', > > > 'is_success' => '0', > > > 'attributes' => { > > > 'external_client' => 1, > > > 'command_rate' => '0' > > > }, > > > 'object' => 'REGISTER', > > > '_OPS_msg_type' => undef, > > > 'response_code' => 485, > > > 'action' => 'REPLY' > > > }; > > > > > > Can anyone shed any light? > > > > > > It would certainly help if we could find a way to reliably > reproduce the > > > problem in the horizon test interface. Since we only have access to a > > > single test account it is not possible for us to register a > domain, then > > > transfer it. It isn't possible to automate the tests unless > we we have a > > > known domain or set of domains that we can always transfer. > > > > > > ... I'll stop here, if I don't I'll just be rambling. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | What I like about deadlines is the lovely > http://BareMetal.com/ | whooshing they make as they rush past. > web hosting since '95 | - Douglas Adams >
