This is basically TinyDNS. Do you use his or TinyDNS's version ? Which one is superior and most stable ?
Best Regards, Alex Brecher Visit us at http://www.Successfulhosting.com We'll make your web site a success! Get your own domain name for only $14.99 http://www.DiscountDomainRegistry.com *****PLEASE DO NOT DELETE ANY PART OF THIS MESSAGE WHEN REPLYING***** ----- Original Message ----- From: "WebWiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:53 PM Subject: Re: BIND > Check out http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html. This is Dan > Bernstein's DNS server. Much more secure than BIND, it's > also faster, and while it doesn't retrieve data from a > database, it does compile the setup to an indexed structure > which can be updated on the fly without restarting the > server. > > It's quite a bit different from BIND in a lot of ways, and > the transition isn't necessarily easy, but this looks like > a superior approach to me. I use it on a handful of servers > and have been VERY impressed. > > Regards, > Eric Longman > Atl-Connect Internet Services > > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net | > | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 | > | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Alex Brecher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mike Frazer" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:22 PM > Subject: RE: BIND > > > I agree with Alex...it seems like an obvious thing to have a version of bind > that every now and then queries for new records from a simplistic table and > loads only the structures into the hash table for the new domains. Why does > that cause such an uproar? Sounds like progress to me... > > -bryanw > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Brecher > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 9:05 AM > To: Mike Frazer > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: BIND > > > Mike, when you are supporting thousands of domains on your nameservers it > takes way more than a few seconds to reload. > > Best Regards, > > Alex Brecher > > Visit us at http://www.Successfulhosting.com > We'll make your web site a success! > > Get your own domain name for only $14.99 > http://www.DiscountDomainRegistry.com > > *****PLEASE DO NOT DELETE ANY PART OF THIS MESSAGE WHEN REPLYING***** > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Frazer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Alex Brecher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:08 AM > Subject: Re: BIND > > > > Restarting BIND *should* be almost instantaneous. Perhaps a few seconds > > or so, but that's not bad. It's got to load records into memory, > > otherwise a query would take 10x longer, if not worse. A few seconds is a > > very good tradeoff for improved performance and a *considerably* smaller > > system hit. > > > > To answer your question (sort of) I am totally unaware of a version of > > BIND that does what you are looking for. Save yourself some time, > > perhaps, and only restart when you add a new record? Does away with any > > unnecessary system load and a few precious seconds of NS downtime. > > > > Mike Frazer > > > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Alex Brecher wrote: > > > > > Is there is a version of bind that can get data from a database WITHOUT > a > > > complete restart ? We're offering DNS services to our clients and we > restart > > > our nameservers once hourly. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Alex Brecher > > > > > > Visit us at http://www.Successfulhosting.com > > > We'll make your web site a success! > > > > > > Get your own domain name for only $14.99 > > > http://www.DiscountDomainRegistry.com > > > > > > *****PLEASE DO NOT DELETE ANY PART OF THIS MESSAGE WHEN REPLYING***** > > > > > > > > >
