CORE indicated to me late last week that they will be providing us with a response this week. I will be sure to pass on more information when I get it.
-rwr ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:15 AM Subject: CORE default-NACK policy > > > any news on this ross? joker/core nacked a transfer request today, > > > - chris paul > > > > Ross Wm. Rader wrote: > > > Anyways, I have been in communication with CORE and I hope that we can > > arrive at an amicable resolution with them on this issue. In most cases with > > TotalNIC, they have been acting as a reseller of CORE's - accordingly, we > > need to take the issue up with CORE and not TotalNIC. I have finally managed > > to get a response from them earlier this week (the same day this post showed > > up I believe) and they indicated that they are currently considering what > > their response to the complaints will be. > > > > > As I stated on November 19th, I'm very interested in learning of the > > > resolution of this issue. Unfortuately I still have a handful of > > > domains at TotalNIC's CORE registry (that's probably not the right word) > > > that I'd like to transfer to OpenSRS but due to their auto nack, I'm > > > unable to do so. Fortunately for me I was able to transfer many of my > > > domains from TotalNIC/CORE -> OpenSRS several months ago but I > > > apparently forgot about some of the domains :/ > > > > > > At 11:17 Uhr -0500 19.11.2001, Michael Schultheiss wrote: > > > >I'm very interested in learning of the resolution of this issue. > > > >Elliot Noss wrote: > > > >> We are actively working on this issue with CORE. Hopefully we will > have more > > > >> to add soon. CORE is very comitted to resolution of the transfer > issue in > > > >> general so they are very open to assisting here. > > > > Philippe Landau wrote: > > > could OpenSRS initiate and organise a legal challenge against this ? > > > TotalNIC will not act before they must fear monetary penalties, > > > as they know that ICANN will not move as they are paid > > > to protect the similar illegal activities of NSI/Verisign. >
