Hello, --- Jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "4.2.4 principles for allocation of Registered Names (e.g., > > first-come/first-served, timely renewal, holding period after > > expiration);" > > > > It is reasonable to believe that WLS would represent an alteration > of > > the allocation of Registered Names, and thus requires a new or > revised > > specification and/or policy. > > I don't see how George. Section 4.2.4 id dealing with INITIAL > registration of a DN, not DN that have lapsed due to non renewal.
I disagree. I don't see the words "initial". It's a change in the allocation mechanism for expired names. > you would have a beef with the ICANN Staff, and 2.) In that there is > no "Official" vote on WLS which I pushed for but got little support > on, it would be difficult to counter claim that a consensus was not > present either. The Registrar Community had the official vote, and WLS lost. That was enough to defeat any notion of 'consensus'. Whether the GA held a vote becomes moot. Sincerely, George Kirikos http://www.kirikos.com/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards� http://movies.yahoo.com/
