If I am not mistaken they were Enom resellers. Best Regards,
Alex Brecher Visit us at http://www.Successfulhosting.com We'll make your web site a success! Register your own domain name for only $14.99 at http://DiscountDomainRegistry.com *****PLEASE DO NOT DELETE ANY PART OF THIS MESSAGE WHEN REPLYING***** ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:22 AM Subject: RE: FTC fines OpenSRS reseller $375,000 > Where does it say that this is an OpenSRS reseller? > > Charles Daminato > OpenSRS Product Manager > Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Genie Livingstone > > Sent: April 25, 2002 10:59 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: FTC fines OpenSRS reseller $375,000 > > > > > > http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2002/04/morgenstern.htm > > > > One of my contacts just sent me this link with the following comentary > > QUOTE > > It's literally pennies on the dollar, but they did finally reach a > > settlement. > > If it were up to me, the guy would be swingin' from the highest yardarm > > in > > Halifax, but instead he gets to keep the great majority of his money and > > pay > > back a pittance. > > The FTC is getting $350,000 to redress consumers, and $25,000 to > > administrate it, for a total of $375,000. The scam itself put somewhere > > in > > the neighborhood of $2,000,000 in Mr. Morganstern's pockets. > > So I guess crime really does pay. All I can hope for is that Darren J. > > Morganstern spent the remaining money on lawyers, and will have to take > > a > > job, as Bob Rivers would say, "folding shirts at the Gap, 'cause at > > least > > then you'll have clothin'." If he starts another Internet venture, I > > hope > > the government will be watching him like a hawk, 'cause once a crook, > > always > > a crook. > > But I bet he's driving away from the settlement talks in a Lexus or > > Porsche, > > with a big smile on his face and a fat wallet. > > UNQUOTE > > > > (my contact is an attorney (nice attorney) and unfortunately I agree > > with his commentary!) > > > > for those of you who do not recall the case, check out our > > http://www.electronicdomainnamemonitoring.com > > for FTC case details > > > > we were unlucky enough to own this domain using it for expired domain > > name > > monitoring services but got swamped by hundreds of consumers thinking we > > are EDNM, so we did not have much choice but to get really proactive to > > assure we are not associated with infamous EDNM > > > > We kept in touch with the FTC Attorney in charge of the case as we were > > getting numerous inquiries from consumers who could not - and cannot - > > manage their domain to this date, those consumers are reporting to us > > that > > they have no response on the phone number published on the site or > > emails they send to them > > > > // see email recieved TODAY// > > QUOTE > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: c******, k******** > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:45 AM > > Subject: Domain Names registered through EDNM > > I would like information and assistance pertaining to three domain names > > that we registered through EDNM. > > b***********.net > > b**********.org > > b**********************.com > > I would like to transfer the hosting provider on > > b************************.com as soon as possible; therefore I need to > > access the account. And I would like to figure out what to do with the > > other two so that I can access them when need be. > > Thanks, > > ****PROTECTED***PRIVACY**** > > UNQUOTE > > // > > > > One really interesting thing is - there are buch of very same or similar > > domain notices circulating as we speek - I have several dozen to prove > > it, either there are copy cats out there or go figure.... > > > > Cheers > > Genie > > eyeondomain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
