At 9:16 AM -0400 5/13/02, Scott Allan wrote: >Everyone should promote good WHOIS info (and explain why; and the >consequences for not doing so). As far as your (and our) obligations >to police the data, it is not expected that you pro-actively test or >check the data and submit reports to us. > >We have an obligation to act on challenges as they arise, but we do >not have to seek out bad data independently.
If you were provided, say, weekly, with a list of domains which had bad whois info, would that be sufficient? That's something I could probably have the RFCI databases kick out on a regular basis to a predefined e-mail address. I'm more than willing to do that. In fact, it's absolutely no trouble, that is to say, "I think I'm going to start doing that, and sending them to <compliance@> unless you give me a better place to send them, and if you have a preferred format you'd like the output in, please let me know so that I make whoever receives these messages jobs easier." ;-) D -- +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Thou art the ruins of the noblest man | | Derek J. Balling | That ever lived in the tide of times. | | | Woe to the hand that shed this costly | | | blood" - Julius Caesar Act 3, Scene 1 | +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+
