Oh yeah. I didn't mean that to jump him. It was more of a "This is so
frustrating to hear about it over and over" kind of comment.
I wish there was something we could collectively do about it, or that the
authorities that be would make them play by the rules.
I was just saying that if this is that important of a domain, to just do it
their way, then try to get your money back if you can.
As much as I hate it when I see chargeback's against my company, I think in
situations like this it is totally warranted.
Chris, I hope you understand that I wasn't trying to slam you. It frustrates
all of us. I guess that point was, to not even waste you time on them.
-Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "Swerve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Loren Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Chris M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: NetSol holding on to names]


> Hey Mark,
>
> Chris may be new to the list.
> His passion about the problem has probably been felt by all of us,
> especially when we first became aware of how things run at Verisign.
>
> regards,
>
> Swerve
>
> > From: "Mark Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 17:12:01 -0700
> > To: "Loren Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Chris
M"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Re: NetSol holding on to names]
> >
> > Wow! How many times has that been said on this list!
> > Yes, it's sucks big time! Just pay it, move it, and charge it back if
it's
> > that big a deal.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chris M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Loren Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Re: NetSol holding on to names]
> >
> >
> >> At 01:23 PM 5/23/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> >>> I second that! Don't risk losing it on the drop -- and it will drop
once
> > it
> >>> goes into transition. There is no recovery at that point anymore.
> >>>
> >>> Pay it for sure, but there's a trick to pay only one year to lessen
the
> >>> "damages." Don't just pay the invoice. Go to mult-year renewals, then
> > select
> >>> "1 year" and follow the very manual steps.
> >>
> >>
> >> HoMan that is total bullshit, someone needs to file a lawsuit on this.
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>> Best, Loren
> >>>
> >>> Swerve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> If the name is important to him,
> >>> he should immediately pay the renewal to Netsol and then transfer to
you
> >>> afterwards.
> >>>
> >>> Swerve
> >>>
> >>>> From: Chris M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:05:07 -0600
> >>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Subject: NetSol holding on to names
> >>>>
> >>>> I have a customer whose domain name expired in January.  NetSol still
> > is
> >>>> holding on to the name.  WTF?  When will it become available so he
> > doesn't
> >>>> have to re-register with them but can instead sign up with us?
> >>>>
> >>>> Chris
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to