Yes! It's the part where they spin their "innovative technolgy" that proves that they just don't get it.
The hammer was "innovative technology" in its time. No one was opposed to the hammer. And we all love SnapName's "innovative technolgy" today. We just object to being beat over the head with it! Best, Loren George Kirikos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Here's a link to a statement by one of their executives at a Senate hearing: http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/061202powell.pdf Pretty bad piece of spin. I leave it as a simple exercise for others to pick it apart, once they stop laughing. I don't think SnapNames and Verisign appear to "get it" -- WLS is facing opposition to the plan amongst very *informed* people, who have a big stake in the outcome. If it was otherwise, proponents of WLS would be able to pick apart the arguments quite easily. Their arguments aren't even "innovative" -- they simply borrow our arguments and keywords, e.g. anti-trust, and attempt to spin them against us, unsuccessfully. High school debating tactics don't cut it in the real world -- you have to do a lot better. Sincerely, George Kirikos http://www.kirikos.com/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
